Author

Year

Source

Ewell, Peter T. & Jones, Dennis P.

1993

Actions Matter: The Case for Indirect Measures in Assessing Higher Education's Progress on the National Education Goals

Journal of General Education, 42(2), p. 123-48.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.0

Rosenthal, Jeffrey S.

1995

Active Learning Strategies in Advanced Mathematics Classes

Studies in Higher Education, 20(2), p. 223-28.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.5

The American College Teacher: National Norms for the 1995-96 HERI Faculty Survey

Higher Education Research Institute, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles.

Issue 1: Department goals and priorities; Issue 3: Professional development & instructional staff support; Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 7: Assessment; Issue 10: Diversity.

1.0, 3.0, 5.0, 7.0, 10.0

Bauman, Steven F. & Martin, William O.

1995

Assessing the Quantitative Skills of College Juniors

Expanded version of article published in "College Mathematics Journal" (26(3), p. 214-220, May 1995).

Issue 7: Assessment.

7.0, 7.4

Croft, W. E.

1997

Attitude of college-level electronics technology majors toward mathematics.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 58-03, Section: A, page: 0784.

Issue 4: Partner disciplines; Issue 8: Student retention.

4.1, 8.1, 8.2

Maines, David R.

1983

"Attrition Processes Out of Mathematics for Undergraduate Students." Attrition from Mathematics as a Social Process. Final Report

National Inst. of Education (ED), Washington, DC.

Issue 8: Student retention; Issue 10: Diversity.

8.0, 8.4, 10.0, 10.1

LaBerge, Victoria Boller

1997

Awareness, Beliefs, and Classroom Practices of Mathematics Faculty at the Collegiate Level

Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association

Issue 2: Program maintenance and monitoring; Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

2.5, 5.0, 5.1, 5.3, 5.5, 6.0, 6.8

Author

Year

Source

Siadat, M. V.

1997

Building study and work skills in a college mathematics classroom.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 58-04, Section: A, page: 1227.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.1

Author

Year

Source

Madison, Bernard L. & Hart, Therese A.

1990

A Challenge of Numbers. People in the Mathematical Sciences

EDRS

Issue 10: Diversity.

10.0, 10.1, 10.2

Steen, Lynn Arthur

1990

Challenges for College Mathematics: An Agenda for the Next Decade. Report of a Joint Task Force

Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC

Issue 1: Department goals and priorities.

1.0

Yusof, Y. M. & Tall, D.

1999

Changing attitudes to university mathematics through problem solving.

Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 67-82.

Issue 8: Student retention.

8.2, 8.3, 8.4

Dey, Eric L. & Hurtado, S.

1995

College Impact, Student Impact: A Reconsideration of the Role of Students within American Higher Education

Higher Education, 30(2), p. 207-23.

Issue 9: Math department as a community of learners.

9.0

Johnson, Elizabeth S.

1993

College Women's Performance in a Math-Science Curriculum: A Case Study

College & University, 68(2), p. 74-78.

Issue 10: Diversity.

10.0, 10.1

Schoenberger, Ann K.

1988

College Women's Persistence in Engineering and Physical Science: A Further Study

Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association

Issue 8: Student retention; Issue 10: Diversity.

8.0, 8.4, 10.0, 10.1

Kamalvand, A.

1997

A combination of cognitive and noncognitive predictors of achievement in college algebra in a predominantly black college.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 59-02, Section: A, page: 0438.

Issue 10: Diversity.

10.2

Park, K. & Travers, Kenneth J.

1996

A comparative study of a computer-based and a standard college first-year calculus course

CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 6, p. 155-176.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology; Issue 8: Student retention.

5.0, 5.2, 5.3, 5.5, 6.0, 6.2, 8.3, 8.2

O'Callaghan, Brian R.

1998

Computer-Intensive Algebra and Students' Conceptual Knowledge of Functions

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), p. 21-40.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

5.0, 5.5, 6.0.

High, Robert V. & Marcellino, Patricia A.

1997

Computer Usage among High School Teachers of Mathematics and College Mathematics Faculty

EDRS

Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

6.0, 6.1, 6.5, 6.8

Dossey, John A. (Ed.)

1998

Confronting the Core Curriculum: Considering Change in the Undergraduate Mathematics Major.

Proceedings of the West Point Core Curriculum Conference in Mathematics

Issue 4: Partner disciplines.

4.0

Alfred, R., Ewell, P., Hudgins, J., & McClenney, K.

1999

Core Indicators of Effectiveness for Community Colleges. Toward High Performance. Second Edition.

Community College Press, American Association of Community Colleges, Washington, DC

Issue 7: Assessment.

7.0

Carlson, M. P.

1998

A cross-sectional investigation of the development of the function concept.

In A. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education III (pp.114-162). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Issue 8: Student retention.

8.0

Hector, J.

1993

Curriculum and Pedagogical Reform for Lower-Division Mathematics: Moving beyond Myths to Standards

Paper presented at "Reinventing the Community College," the Annual Computer Conference of the League for Innovation in the Community College

Issue 1: Department goals and priorities.

1.0

Author

Year

Source

Ewell, Peter T. & Jones, Dennis P.

1994

Data, Indicators, and the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems

New Directions for Institutional Research, 82, p. 23-35.

Issue 1: Department goals and priorities.

1.0

Rancifer, Jesse L. & Pinchback, C.

1990

The Decline of Blacks in Mathematics: Implications for Elementary, Secondary, and Higher Education

Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association

Issue 8: Student retention; Issue 10: Diversity.

8.0, 8.4, 10.0, 10.2

Beckett, T. M.

1999

Development of conceptual understanding of statistics for concrete thinkers in a constructivist learning environment.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 60-08, Section: A, page: 2841.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.2

Author

Year

Source

Miller, G. S.

1999

The effect of computer tutorial software as a mode of instruction in intermediate algebra.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 60-06, Section: A, page: 1950.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

5.2, 6.6

Lindboe, T. A.

1998

The effectiveness of peer instruction in the learning environment of low-achieving undergraduate mathematics students.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 59-06, Section: A, page: 1938.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.2, 5.3

Hollar, J. C. & Norwood, K.

1999

The Effects of a graphing-approach intermediate algebra curriculum on students' understanding of function.

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 220-26.

Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

6.5

Cates, B. B.

2000

The effects of calculator-based laboratory activities on college algebra students' understanding of the function concept and graphing.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 61-03, Section: A, page: 0921.

Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

6.5

Palmiter, Jeanette R.

1991

Effects of Computer Algebra Systems on Concept and Skill Acquisition in Calculus

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(2), p. 151-56.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

5.5, 6.6

Lawton, T. C.

1999

Effects of graphing calculators on students' confidence and performance in college algebra: Race and gender related differences.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 60-07, Section: A, page: 2353.

Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology; Issue 10:Diversity.

6.5, 10.1, 10.2

Loud, B. J.

1999

Effects of journal writing on attitudes, beliefs, and achievement of students in college mathematics courses.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 60-03, Section: A, page: 0680.

Issue 7: Assessment.

7.4

Abadir, L.

1993

Effects of mastery learning strategies on community college mathematics students' achievement and success rate.

Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Atlanta, GA, April 12-16, 1993).

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 8: Student retention.

5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.5, 8.0, 8.4

Springer, Leonard, Stanne, Mary Elizabeth, & Donovan, Samuel

1997

Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper

Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.0, 5.3, 5.5

Durmus, S.

1999

The effects of the use of the technology on college algebra students' achievements and attitudes toward mathematics: A constructivist approach.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 60-10, Section: A, page: 3622.

Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

6.5

Sigma XI, The Scientific Research Society.,

1990

Entry-Level Undergraduate Courses in Science, Mathematics and Engineering: An Investment in Human Resources

Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society, Research Triangle Park, NC

Issue 2: Program maintenance and monitoring; Issue 4: Partner disciplines; Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 7: Assessment.

2.0, 4.0, 5.0, 7.0

Miller, D. R.

1999

Exploring the integration of technology in collegiate mathematics.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 60-04, Section: A, page: 1056.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

5.1, 5.4, 6.0

Author

Year

Source

Zazkis, R.

2000

Factors, divisors, and multiples: Exploring the web of students' connections.

In E. Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput, (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education IV (pp.210-238). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Issue 8: Student retention.

8.0

Steig, M. J.

1999

Factors related to community college student choice between three college algebra learning environments.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 60-03, Section: A, page: 0682.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

5.3, 6.6

Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarsky, B.

1997

From Verbal Descriptions to Graphic Representations: Stability and Change in Students' Alternative Conceptions.

Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32(3), p. 229-263.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.4

Author

Year

Source

McFerron, J. Richard

1991

The Graduate School: Teaching and Research Support in Higher Education

Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (ED), Washington, DC.

Issue 1: Department goals and priorities; Issue 2: Program maintenance and monitoring.

1.0, 2.0

Burton, L. (Ed.)

1990

Gender and Mathematics: An International Perspective

Outcome of the Women and Mathematics Topic Area at the International Congress on Mathematics Education

Issue 8: Student retention; Issue 10: Diversity.

8.0, 8.1, 8.4, 10.0, 10.1

Rech, Janice F.

1996

Gender Differences in Mathematics Achievement and Other Variables among University Students

Journal of Research & Development in Education, 29(2), p. 73-76.

Issue 8: Student retention; Issue 10: Diversity.

8.0, 8.4, 10.0, 10.1

Dorner, C. D.

1998

Gender difference in the prediction of college mathematics course performance.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 60-03, Section: A, page: 0669.

Issue 10: Diversity.

10.1

Mathews, Susann M.

1991

Group Problem Solving in the College Mathematics Classroom

Primus, 1(4), p. 430-42.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.2, 5.3, 5.5

Seymour, E.

1995

Guest Comment: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences

American Journal of Physics, 63(3), p. 199-202.

Issue 8: Student retention; Issue 10: Diversity.

8.0, 8.4, 10.0, 10.1, 10.2

Author

Year

Source

Barna, J. & Winstead, J.

1993

Harvey Mudd College: Technology Integration Offers Unique Opportunities for Undergraduates

T.H.E. Journal, 21(2), p. 105-08.

Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

6.0, 6.1, 6.5, 6.6

Steen, Lynn Arthur (Ed.)

1992

Heeding the Call for Change: Suggestions for Curricular Action

Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC

Issue 1: Department goals and priorities.

1.0

Meel, D. E.

2000

Honors students' calculus understandings: Comparing Calculus&Mathematica and traditional calculus students.

In A. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education III (pp.163-215). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.0

Author

Year

Source

Frid, S.

1997

Identifying Avenues for Curriculum Development in Undergraduate Mathematics

Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 7: Assessment; Issue 8: Student retention; Issue 10: Diversity.

5.0, 7.0, 8.0, 8.3, 10.0

Bosche, W. W.

1997

Impact of a nontraditional technology-enhanced approach on student conceptualization in a precalculus course.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 58-08, Section: A, page: 3049.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

5.1, 5.2, 6.5, 6.6

Hector, Judith H. & Hector, Mark A.

1992

Impact of State-Mandated Developmental Studies on College Student Retention

Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association

Issue 8: Student retention.

8.0

Yuan, Y.

1999

The impact of student learning style and classroom environment interactions on the development of the function concept in college algebra students.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 60-07, Section: A, page: 2418.

Issue 1: Department goals and priorities.

1.4

Ewell, Peter T. & Jones, Dennis P.

1996

Indicators of "Good Practice" in Undergraduate Education: A Handbook for Development and Implementation

National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, Boulder, CO

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.0

National Science Foundation

1996

Indicators of Science and Mathematics Education 1995

National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.

Issue 10: Diversity.

10.0

Gorini, Catherine A.

1991

An Inegrated Program of Writing and Speaking in the Undergraduate Mathematics Curriculum

Primus, 1(3), p. 244-52

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.0, 5.5

1986

Integrating science, math and technology-Academic sacrilege.

The Weaver, 4(2), p. 2,4.

Issue 4: Partner disciplines.

4.0

Johnson, B. L.

2000

Investigation of the factors affecting attitudes toward mathematics of students in different college mathematics courses.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 61-07, Section: A, page: 2612.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 9: The Mathematics department as a community of learners.

5.5, 9.3

Hirst, K. & Shiu, C.

1995

Investigations in Pure Mathematics: A Constructivist Perspective

Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 3, p. 1-14.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 8: Student retention.

5.0, 5.5, 8.0, 8.3

Author

Year

Source

Gray, E., Pitta, D. & Tall, D.

1999

Knowledge construction and diverging thinking in elementary and advanced mathematics.

Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38, 111-133.

Issue 8: Student retention.

8.0

Author

Year

Source

Martin, W. O.

2000

Lasting effects of the integrated use of graphing technologies in precalculus mathematics.

In E. Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput, (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education IV (pp.154-173). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

6.5, 6.6

Brenner, M. E.

1997

Learning by Understanding: The Role of Multiple Representations in Learning Algebra.

American Educational Research Journal, 34(4), p. 663-689.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.4

Cassity, Constance L.

1997

Learning with Technology: Research on Graphing Calculators

In: Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1997 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology

Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology; Issue 8: Student retention.

6.0, 6.2, 6.8, 8.4

Marcus, D.

1993

Lessons Learned from FIPSE Projects II

EDRS

Issue 1: Department goals and priorities.

1.0

Author

Year

Source

Lips, Hilary M.

1984

Math/Science Self-Schemas and Curriculum Choices among University Women

Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 8: Student retention; Issue 10: Diversity.

5.0, 5.5, 8.0, 8.1, 8.3, 8.4, 10.0, 10.1

Whiteley, Meredith A.

1987

Mathematics and College Students: The Dimensions and Effects of the College Mathematics Experience

Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association

Issue 8: Student retention.

8.0

Meeks, D.

1997

Mathematics anxiety and community college mathematics course completion.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 58-03, Section: A, page: 0711.

Issue 10: Diversity.

10.1, 10.2

Carter, Deborah J. & Wilson, R.

1996

Minorities in Higher Education. 1995-96: Fourteenth Annual Status Report

American Council on Education, Washington, DC

Issue 10: Diversity.

10.0, 10.2

Tucker, Alan C. (Ed.)

1995

Models that Work: Case Studies in Effective Undergraduate Mathematics Programs. MAA Notes Number 38

Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.0

National Academy of Sciences

1991

Moving Beyond Myths: Revitalizing Undergraduate Mathematics

National Research Council Washington DC. Mathematical Sciences Education Board.

Issue 1: Department goals and priorities.

1.0

Author

Year

Source

Ganter, S. L., & Jiroutek, M. R.

2000

The need for evaluation in the calculus reform movement: A comparison of two calculus teaching methods.

In E. Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput, (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education IV (pp.42-62). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.0

Author

Year

Source

Dubinsky, E. & Yiparaki, O.

2000

On student understanding of AE and EA quantification.

In E. Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput, (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education IV (pp.239-89). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Issue 8: Student retention.

8.0

Author

Year

Source

Banks, D. & Railsback, G.

1988

A Pilot Study on Needs in the Sciences in Community Colleges

Ford Foundation, New York, NY.

Issue 1: Department goals and priorities; Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 5.6, 6.1

Bridgeman, B. & Wendler, C.

1989

Prediction of Grades in College Mathematics Courses as a Component of the Placement Validity of SAT-Mathematics Scores. College Board Report No. 89-9

College Board Publications, New York, NY.

Issue 8: Student retention; Issue 10: Diversity.

8.0, 10.0

Haug, Carolyn A. & Marion, Scott F.

1996

Professional Networks for Educational Change: An Evaluation of the Mathematician and Education Reform Forum

National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.

Issue 2: Program maintenance and monitoring; Issue 3: Professional development & instructional staff support.

2.0, 3.0, 3.1

Zbiek, R. M.

1998

Prospective teachers' use of computing tools to develop and validate functions as mathematical models.

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29,184-201.

Issue 8: Student retention.

8.0

Author

Year

Source

Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M.

1998

Qualitatively Different Experiences of Learning Mathematics at University.

Learning & Instruction. 8(5), 455-68.

Issue 8: Student retention.

8.0

Author

Year

Source

Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Reynolds, B. (Eds.)

1997

Readings in Cooperative Learning for Undergraduate Mathematics. MAA Notes No. 44

Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.0, 5.5

American Mathematical Society

1994

Recognition and Rewards in the Mathematical Sciences. Report of the Joint Policy Board for Mathematics Committee on Professional Recognition and Rewards

National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.

Issue 3: Professional development & instructional staff support.

3.0, 3.2

Kenschaft, P.

1990

Recruitment and Retention of Students in Undergraduate Mathematics

College Mathematics Journal, 21(4), p. 294-301.

Issue 8: Student retention.

8.0

Ferren, Ann S. & McCafferty, Jeffrey K.

1992

Reforming College Mathematics

College Teaching, 40(3), p. 87-90.

Issue 8: Student retention.

8.0, 8.3, 8.2

Cassity, C. L.

1997

The relation of gender, special visualization, mathematics confidence, and classroom graphing calculator utilization to conceptual mathematical performance: Learning with technology.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 58-08, Section: A, page: 3095.

Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

6.5

Smith, Theresa Y.

1995

The Retention Status of Underrepresented Minority Students: An Analysis of Survey Results from Sixty-Seven U.S. Colleges and Universities.

Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research

Issue 8: Student retention; Issue 10: Diversity.

8.0, 8.4, 10.0, 10.1, 10.2

Heid, M. Kathleen

1988

Resequencing Skills and Concepts in Applied Calculus Using the Computer as a Tool

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), p. 3-25.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

5.0, 6.0

Seese, L.

1994

Revising the Mathematics Department

Paper presented at the International Conference for Community College Chairs and Deans

Issue 1: Department goals and priorities; Issue 2: Program maintenance and monitoring; Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology; Issue 7: Assessment; Issue 10: Diversity.

1.0, 1.2, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 5.0, 5.5, 5.6, 6.0, 6.3, 7.0, 7.1, 10.0

LaTorre, Donald R.

1991

Revitalized Undergraduate Mathematics with Symbol Manipulating Graphics Calculators. Final Report

Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (ED), Washington, DC.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.1, 6.3, 6.4, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8

Darrow, J. R.

1997

Revitalizing the curriculum: using original sources, history, and writing in undergraduate mathematics.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 58-05, Section: A, page: 1627.

Issue 2: Program maintenance and monitoring.

2.6, 2.7

Kasten, M.

1988

The Role of Calculus in College Mathematics. ERIC/SMEAC Mathematics Education Digest No. 1

Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology; Issue 8: Student retention.

5.0, 6.0, 8.0

Nigam, P.

1998

The role of visualization in teaching undergraduate mathematics: A multicase study of teachers' perceptions and practices.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 59-07, Section: A, page: 2406.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.1, 5.4

Author

Year

Source

Ethington, Corinna A.

1987

SAT-M Performance of Women Intending Quantitative Fields of Study

EDRS

Issue 0: Department demographics; Issue 8: Student retention.

0.3, 8.4

National Science Foundation

1996

Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology

National Science Foundation, Washington DC.

Issue 1: Department goals and priorities.

1.0

Nimmons, L. A.

1997

Spacial ability and dispositions toward mathematics in college algebra: Gender-related differences.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 58-08, Section: A, page: 3054.

Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology; Issue 8: Student retention; Issue 10:Diversity.

6.5, 8.3, 10.1

Calvert, J. M.

1999

Student and faculty perspectives on Internet resource usage in undergraduate university science and mathematics courses .

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 60-02, Section: A, page: 0320.

Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

6.6

Schoenfeld, A.

1997

Student Assessment in Calculus: A Report to the NSF Working Group on Assessment in Calculus.

The Mathematical Association of America, MAA Notes No. 43.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 7: Assesment.

5.5, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4

Keller, B. A., & Hirsch, C. R.

1998

Student Preferences For Representations of Functions

International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology, 29(1), p. 1-17

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

5.4, 6.0

Gibson, D.

1998

Students' use of diagrams to develop proofs in an introductory analysis course.

In A. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education III (pp.284-307). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Issue 8: Student retention.

8.0

Alsawaie, O. N.

2000

A study of students' experiences and learning styles in advanced Mathematica-based college mathematics courses.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 61-04, Section: A, page: 1332.

Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology; Issue 9: The Mathematics department as a community of learners.

6.3, 6.6, 6.7, 9.3

Lucas, C. A.

1999

A study of the effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement and self-efficacy of college algebra students.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 61-02, Section: A, page: 0538.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 10: Diversity.

5.3, 10.1

Rodgers, Kathy V. & Wilding, William G.

1998

Studying the Placement of Students in the Entry-Level College Mathematics Courses

Primus, 8(3), p. 203-08.

Issue 7: Assessment.

7.0, 7.1, 7.2

Murphy, T. J., Stafford, K. L., & McCreary, P.

1998

Subsequent course and degree paths of students in a Treisman-style workshop calculus program.

Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 4(4), 381-396.

Issue 8: Student retention; Issue 10: Diversity.

8.3, 10.1, 10.2

Hagedorn, Linda Serra

1997

Success in College Mathematics: Comparisons between Remedial and Non-Remedial First Year College Students

Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association

Issue 8: Student retention; Issue 10: Diversity.

8.4, 10.0, 10.1, 10.2

Baranchik, A. & Cherkas, B.

1998

Supplementary methods for assessing student performance on a standardized test in elementary algebra.

In A. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education III (pp.216-33). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Issue 7: Assessment.

7.1

Moreno, S. E., Muller, C., Asera, R., Wyatt, L., & Epperson, J.

1999

Supporting minority mathematics achievement: The Emerging Scholars Program at the University of Texas at Austin.

Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 5(1), 53-66.

Issue 10: Diversity.

10.1, 10.2

Author

Year

Source

Artigue, M.

2000

Teaching and learning calculus: What can be learned from education research and curricular change in France?

In E. Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput, (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education IV (pp.1-15). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.0

Kaput, James J. & Thompson, Patrick W.

1994

Technology in Mathematics Education Research: The First 25 Years in the JRME

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(6), p. 667-84

Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

6.0, 6.1, 6.4

Adams, Thomasenia Lott

1997

Technology makes a difference in community college mathematics teaching.

Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 21(5), p. 481-91.

Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology; Issue 7: Assessment.

6.0, 6.8, 7.0, 7.1

Grandy, J.

1987

Ten-Year Trends in SAT Scores and Other Characteristics of High School Seniors Taking the SAT and Planning To Study Mathematics, Science, or Engineering.

National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.

Issue 0: Department demographics; Issue 8: Student retention.

0.3, 0.4, 8.4

Grandy, J.

1987

Trends in the Selection of Science, Mathematics, or Engineering as Major Fields of Study among Top-Scoring SAT Takers.

National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.

Issue 0: Department demographics; Issue 8: Student retention.

0.3, 8.4

Author

Year

Source

McDonald, M. A., Mathews, D. M., & Strobel, K. H.

2000

Understanding sequences: A tale of two objects.

In E. Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput, (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education IV (pp.77-102). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Issue 8: Student retention.

8.0

High, Robert V.

1998

The Use of Computer Software in the Teaching of College Mathematics and Statistics

EDRS

Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 6.7, 6.8

Rucker, S.

1997

The use of cooperative learning in undergraduate discrete mathematics courses.

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 58-08, Section: A, page: 3055.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.1

William, C. G.

1998

Using concept maps to assess conceptual knowledge of function.

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 414-21.

Issue 7: Assessment.

7.1

Author

Year

Source

Fisher, Gwen Laura

1996

The Validity of Pre-Calculus Multiple Choice and Performance-Based Testing as a Predictor of Undergraduate Mathematics and Chemistry Achievement

EDRS

Issue 7: Assessment.

7.0, 7.1, 7.4

Galindo, E.

1991

Visualization and Students' Performance in Technology-Based Calculus

Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education

Issue 5: Instructional strategies; Issue 6: Classroom uses of technology.

5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.1, 6.5

Author

Year

Source

Astin, Alexander W.

1993

What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited.

Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco, CA

Issue 8: Student retention; Issue 9: Math department as a community of learners.

8.0, 9.0

Astin, Alexander W.

1993

What Matters in College?

Liberal Education, 79(4), p. 4-15.

Issue 8: Student retention; Issue 9: Math department as a community of learners.

8.0, 9.0

Selden, A., Selden, J., Hauk, S., & Mason, A.

2000

Why can't calculus students access their knowledge to solve non-routine problems?

In E. Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput, (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education IV (pp.128-53). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Issue 8: Student retention.

8.0

Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Chambers, B., Poulsen, C., & Spence, J. C.

2000

Why should we group students within-class for learning?

Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(2), 158-179.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.1

Melita, J. A.

1999

Writing readable mathematical proofs: An exploratory study .

Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 60-03, Section: A, page: 0680.

Issue 5: Instructional strategies.

5.1